Legally Reviewed by Joseph P. Williams on June 9, 2026
The F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Company was one of America’s most storied breweries — and one of its most significant sources of industrial asbestos exposure in New York. Workers who built, maintained, and operated the Schaefer facilities in Brooklyn and later Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania spent decades surrounded by asbestos-containing insulation, construction materials, and filtration systems at a time when the full dangers of asbestos were actively concealed by manufacturers. Many of those workers and their family members are now facing diagnoses of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases decades after the fact.
At The Williams Law Firm, P.C., New York asbestos attorney Joseph P. Williams has spent more than 30 years representing Brooklyn workers and their families in exactly these cases. If you worked at the Schaefer brewery or any other New York industrial facility and have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or an asbestos-related disease, contact us today for a free consultation. You pay nothing unless we win.
The F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Company was founded in 1842 by German immigrants Friedrich and Maximilian Schaefer. For most of the twentieth century, its primary production facility was a large industrial complex in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. The Brooklyn plant operated through 1976 before production was consolidated to a new facility in Allentown, Pennsylvania, where the company operated until it was acquired by Stroh Brewing Company in 1981.
The Brooklyn plant was constructed and expanded during the peak decades of asbestos use in industrial construction. Like virtually all large industrial and commercial buildings of the era, it incorporated asbestos throughout its structure: in pipe insulation running through the boiler rooms and mechanical systems, in the fireproofing applied to structural steel, in floor and ceiling tiles throughout the facility, in gaskets and packing on brewing equipment, and in the roofing and cement materials used in construction and renovation. Workers who built, renovated, and maintained the facility from the 1940s through the 1970s faced sustained asbestos exposure throughout their careers.
What made brewery asbestos exposure uniquely severe compared to many other industrial settings was that asbestos was not only in the building — it was a direct component of the brewing process. The beer and beverage industry used asbestos-fiber filtration systems as a production standard for decades.
Paper filters reinforced with asbestos fibers became the industry standard for beer and wine filtration beginning in the early 1900s, valued for producing clear, impurity-free beverages. These filters typically contained as much as 50 percent chrysotile asbestos by composition. Pure carded asbestos fibers were sometimes used directly in filtration processes, replaced as often as 100 times per day at high-volume facilities. Some filter configurations required replacement after every use. Each replacement event released clouds of asbestos fiber into the air around the filter operator.
By the early 1970s, approximately 900 tons of asbestos were used annually across the beverage filtration industry. A 1982 EPA report confirmed that as of 1979, approximately 30 percent of wine producers, 10 percent of beer producers, and 25 percent of distilling producers in the United States were still using asbestos-based filtration. Workers handling these filters had no effective protection — the required replacements made continuous exposure nearly unavoidable.
Asbestos exposure at the Schaefer brewery affected workers across virtually every department and trade that operated within the facility. The positions at highest risk included:
Many of these workers were members of Brooklyn and New York union locals whose members Attorney Williams has represented throughout his career. If you are a former Schaefer worker or family member of one, he will personally review your case.
Asbestos exposure at Schaefer was not limited to those who worked at the facility. Workers who handled asbestos-containing materials carried microscopic fibers home on their work clothing, skin, and hair at the end of every shift. Spouses who laundered those work clothes were directly exposed to released fibers. Children who greeted parents returning from work, sat on their laps, or were present when work clothing was removed or shaken out were also exposed.
Many family members of Schaefer workers and workers at similar brewing and industrial facilities have developed mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer from this secondary exposure — having never set foot in the brewery themselves. If a family member’s occupational exposure at Schaefer or another New York brewery contributed to your diagnosis, you may have a valid legal claim in your own right. Learn more about asbestos exposure in New York and secondary exposure claims.
In April 2026, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in a case involving Pabst Brewing Company and a union steamfitter named Gerald Lorbiecki who developed mesothelioma after working with asbestos-insulated pipes at a Pabst brewery in the 1970s. The court ruled 5-2 that Pabst owed a duty of safety to all workers on its premises, including independent contractors and subcontractors — not just its own direct employees. The Lorbiecki estate was awarded a $7 million verdict.
The ruling reinforces a principle that applies broadly in New York and New Jersey asbestos litigation: building owners and facility operators who knew their premises contained asbestos cannot escape liability simply because the injured worker was a contractor or subcontractor rather than a direct employee. Breweries, including Schaefer, that used asbestos throughout their facilities and in their production processes owed a duty of care to every worker who set foot in the building — regardless of who signed their paycheck.
This decision is directly relevant to former Schaefer workers and contractors who performed construction, maintenance, or filter work at the Brooklyn or Pennsylvania facilities. If you were told you cannot pursue a claim because you were a contractor or union tradesperson rather than a Schaefer employee, this ruling — and New York law — may tell a different story.
Workers and family members exposed to asbestos at the Schaefer brewing facilities may develop any of the recognized asbestos-related diseases, all of which have latency periods of 20 to 50 years. The most serious conditions include mesothelioma (a cancer of the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or heart), asbestos-related lung cancer, asbestosis (progressive and irreversible scarring of lung tissue), and pleural thickening and pleural plaques. Symptoms that may indicate asbestos-related disease include persistent shortness of breath, a dry cough that does not resolve, chest pain or tightness, unexplained weight loss, and abdominal pain or swelling. Anyone with a history of work at Schaefer or another brewing facility who develops these symptoms should inform their physician of their exposure history immediately.
Former Schaefer workers and their families have legal options through both civil litigation against the manufacturers of asbestos-containing products used at the facility, and through claims against the more than 60 active asbestos trust funds established by bankrupt manufacturers whose products caused occupational exposure at breweries and industrial facilities across New York.
In New York, the statute of limitations for mesothelioma personal injury claims is three years from the date of diagnosis. For wrongful death claims, the deadline is two years from the date of death. Because mesothelioma develops 20 to 50 years after the original exposure, many workers exposed at Schaefer in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s are still within the filing window today if they have recently received a diagnosis. Contacting an attorney as soon as possible after diagnosis is the most important step to preserving your legal rights.
Attorney Joseph P. Williams has never lost a mesothelioma case and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for asbestos exposure victims and their families, including former construction tradespeople, union members, and industrial workers from Brooklyn and throughout New York City. He handles all asbestos cases on a contingency fee basis — no upfront fees, no costs unless compensation is recovered — and will come to your home so that seriously ill patients never have to travel. Reach out through our contact form to schedule a free consultation today.
Asbestos was used at the Schaefer brewery in two main ways. First, the facility itself was constructed with asbestos-containing materials standard in industrial buildings of the era: pipe insulation, boiler insulation, structural fireproofing, floor and ceiling tiles, gaskets, and roofing. Second, and uniquely for the brewing industry, asbestos was used directly in the beer filtration process. Filters containing up to 50 percent chrysotile asbestos were used to clarify beer and had to be replaced constantly — sometimes up to 100 times per day — releasing asbestos fiber with each replacement.
Yes. The April 2026 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling in the Pabst Brewing case confirmed that building owners and facility operators owe a duty of care to all workers on their premises, including independent contractors and subcontractors. In New York asbestos litigation, this principle has long been recognized — facility owners who knew their premises contained asbestos and failed to protect workers cannot escape liability simply because the exposed worker was employed by a contractor rather than the brewery itself. Union tradespeople — pipefitters, insulators, boilermakers, electricians — who worked at Schaefer are eligible to pursue claims.
Yes. Family members who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases from secondary exposure — caused by asbestos fibers carried home on a worker’s clothing — have the right to file their own legal claims. Spouses who laundered work clothing and children who had regular contact with workers coming home from the Schaefer facility have been diagnosed with mesothelioma in cases directly analogous to those Attorney Williams handles. Secondary exposure claims are established under New York law and are evaluated on the same basis as direct occupational exposure claims.
In New York, the statute of limitations for mesothelioma personal injury claims is three years from the date of diagnosis. For wrongful death claims brought by a family member, the deadline is two years from the date of death. Because mesothelioma develops 20 to 50 years after the original asbestos exposure, workers exposed at Schaefer in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s who have recently received a diagnosis are often still within the filing window. Contacting an attorney as soon as possible after diagnosis is critical to preserving your right to pursue compensation.
Compensation available to former Schaefer workers and their families may include civil litigation verdicts or settlements against the manufacturers of asbestos-containing products used at the facility, claims against asbestos trust funds established by bankrupt manufacturers, and in certain cases punitive damages. Recoverable damages typically include past and future medical expenses, lost income and earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium. The Williams Law Firm handles all mesothelioma cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning no upfront costs and no attorney fees unless compensation is recovered.
Get a copy of our FREE mesothelioma e-book by attorney Joseph Williams
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Google Tag Manager simplifies the management of marketing tags on your website without code changes.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Clarity is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Service URL: clarity.microsoft.com (opens in a new window)